Dr. Dee Carter’s Rejoinder

Author: Dr. Dee Carter

Abstract:

Many thanks to Rob for his paper and the invitation to respond. This will not be a close (critical) response, but more a complementary, conversational contribution. Much could be said, but word limits require brevity. Suffice to say that I am in agreement with the thrust of his narrative, and should argue the need for theologians, scholars of religion/theology, and for the body of the church as a whole to think about this issue. For historically, the whole of creation – human and non-human – has not been adequately addressed, theologically; mainly the tradition has concentrated on humanity as the sole subject of God’s redeeming concern.
The issue is not simply one of ethics, important though these are. For theology is an attempt to understand and articulate God’s engagement with the world; hence Christian hope in the ultimate goal, summed up in the concept of shalom – peace, justice and the integrity of creation – is a commitment that is not merely an ethical imperative. Rather, all the processes of life in its materiality are always already at stake in the theological task.

Full PDF:

PDF

To discuss the article leave a comment below…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s